منظمة ضحايا حرب العراق تحتاج الى دعمكم العاجل لمساعدتنا على الاستمرار في توثيق الضحايا المدنيين - ساعدنا من خلال التبرع الآن.

 
هذه الصفحة لم تتم ترجمتها إلى اللغة العربية بعد. يمكنكم الحصول على ترجمة ألية من غوغل ولكن كونوا على علم بأن الترجمة الآلية ليست موثوقة ويمكن أن تشوه المعنى. وقد تم توفير هذه الخدمة كوسيلة مساعدة فقط. وينبغي عدم اعتمادها في الاستشهاد بوجهات نظر المشروع. وعند الحاجة للاقتباس يرجى طلب ترجمة احترافية لهذه الصفحة.    

Many experts and expert groups from a range of fields are attempting to combine their knowledge to understand the lethality to Iraqis of the invasion and post-invasion violence in Iraq.

This is a slightly abridged and amended version of an invited "meta-analysis" of IBC's potential contribution to that understanding, presented in a closed meeting of the Ad Hoc Expert Group on mortality estimates for Iraq, convened by WHO in Geneva, May 2007.

Implications of delay data

The previous finding leaves open the question of whether it is possible that editors (by which would have to be meant local and international editors) ignore stories involving Iraqi civilian casualties that don’t happen to land on their desks the same day, no matter how grevious, and that this accounts for their absence from the public record.

The answer to this question is clearly no, for the simple reason that reports do continue to be published, particularly of significant incidents, for a week or so (sometimes considerably longer) after the event. This is true for around 7% of cases, and across a range of different types of incident.